10 January 2007

Strategy v Tactics -or- How Bush is Stupid

Strategy: the planning and conduct of battles to gain the end of war

Tactics: a plan for engaging and defeating an enemy in battle

---

George Bush has finally made his appearance. He waited. He hid. By keeping the doors closed and the phone lines secure since the November elections, Bush has effectively held the citizenry of this country in limbo. Equally important, but almost always forgotten, he has kept the citizenry of Iraq hostage to the terror and strife that descended there in the aftermath of our "mission accomplished" victory.

For two months the President and his staff have been talking about the unveiling of a new "strategy" in Iraq. Their words.

We can look at the definitions above and see that strategy is big picture. Tactics are small picture. You win a battle with tactics. You win the war with strategy. Are battles important? Absolutely. But not if they don't help towards your objective. In terms of football: first downs are only useful if you don't turn the ball over ever possession.

So, what did Bush say? Well, he said basically only two things. (One might argue a third.) First, he said that he is ultimately responsible for the errors of the war thus-far. Interesting, but ultimately unimportant. We all knew this anyway; he's just attempting to gain some measure of credibility by his apparent humility. Second, he said he's sending in 21,000 more troops. And that's it.

What he didn't say is more telling. He did not say that we are going to change the mission of the troops that are in Iraq. He did not say that we are going to engage in aggressive diplomacy with the states of the region to enlist their help in stabilizing Iraq. He did not say that we are going to undertake a massive effort the likes of which haven't been seen since the end of WW II to rebuild the shattered country of Iraq. He did not say that the US will put massive pressure on the peace process in Israeli occupied territories to help treat the cause of the terrorism disease.

From what he didn't say we can deduce that he did not in fact change the strategy for the war. He changed the tactics. More troops. "Stay the Course II."

Sequels are always worse than the original.

No comments: